Chang HW, Yang W, Yu L, Gao DW, Zhang F, Chen ZC, Chen BL, Zhang LM, Zhu R, Zhang Q, Li ZY, Rao JG. Study on the correlation between molecular characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and its epidemiology and clinical manifestations in Lu’an city. World J Virol 2026; 15(1): 118988 [PMID: 41884445 DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v15.i1.118988]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Overall, the final layout and typesetting of our article were excellent. We particularly appreciated the journal's considerable flexibility and tolerance regarding the verification of biological statistics, ethical review, and non-native English proofreading. The feedback was also very prompt, which made for a truly pleasant submission experience for the authors.
However, we would like to offer a suggestion regarding the proofreading stage. It might be beneficial for the journal to consider leveraging modern artificial intelligence software to assist in the proofreading process. This could help minimize the risk of inadvertent errors that may occasionally arise during manual proofreading.
We hope this suggestion is helpful for further improving your publishing quality.
Reply from the Editorial Office
Thanks for taking the time to share this feedback with us. We would love to work with you again!